Showing posts with label Killing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Killing. Show all posts

Monday, October 30, 2023

NOVEMBER 2023 - THE MONTH OF CHAOS

NOVEMBER - THE MONTH OF CHAOS

THIS WILL BE A MONTH PF CHAOS

ESPECIALLY IN THE CITIES

WE HAVE FOOD

WE HAVE A WATER FILTER

BANKS WILL BEGIN TO FAIL OPENLY

CASH WILL BEGIN TO RUN OUT

DISTRIBUTION PLANTS IN MAJOPR CITIES

WILL BE BLOCKED BY FBI ACTORS

FOOD SHORTAGES MANE MORE FOOD INFLATION

BIDEN WILL TRY TO START MOER WARS -

TAIWAN - KOREAS - INDONESIA - AFRICA - SERBIA

MASSIVE WEATHER FRONTS CREATED BY NASA

WILL KILL AND DETROY SO MANY
----------------------------------------------

AND MORE MASSIVE ASSASSINATIONS

OF CHRISITANS WORLD WIDE

OF REAL JEWISH PEOPLE WORLD WIDE

BY  LUCIFER'S CHINA AND USA
------------------------------------------------


AND SO IT BEGINS

MASSIVE DESTRUCTION BY THE USA/LUCIFER

-----------------------------------------------

PRAY THEIR LEADERS CHANGE IMMEDIATELY

----------------------------------------------


NOW WE NEED GOLD

THE ONLY THING STABLE

SO WE GOTO NOBLE GOLD

WHY?

THEY MAKE BUYING GOLD FUN

877-646-54347

The Wall Of Truth
Dr William Mount








Thursday, February 27, 2020

Credit Markets Freeze World Wide As Democracy Turns To Despotism

As credit markets freeze due to the installation of 5G(Whiz) our electric officials turn to Despotism --

The Order is being given to install 5G(Whiz) across the planet

Where 5G(whiz) goes, Quarantines follow

So tell me Mr President - How A Foreign Owned Corporation Like the CDC Can Contain American Citizens - in Quarantine Centers and FEMA Camps - which is planned?

And Mr President

How Does A Private Corporation Get Our Tax Payer Support To Install Something That Kills Us LIKE 5G(Whiz)?

They are all Foreign Owned Corporations Now Killing Americans.

GOD will deal with whoever allowed it - so HE has said it, so it shall be.


VIDEO:   (50) Credit Systems Freeze World Wide - Democracy Turns To Despotism - YouTube


The Wall Of Truth

Dr William B. Mount
=========================================

Libtards Are, By Definition, Suicidal

They Are Demanding The Importation Of Muslims - Which Want To Kill Them

And They Are Pouring Into America On UPS Jets

So Not Supporting The President So They Can Kill Themselves Is Blowing Libtard Minds
=========================================

Support Your Local Immune System With This Collagen

Goto: http:www/healthwithwilliam.com

=========================================

YOU DECIDE:





\


Sunday, November 10, 2019

Huge Breast Milk Scandal Nation Wide

While we were all enthralled about this Clown Show in DC , or watching our economy fall apart, our hospitals have been buying contaminated Breast Milk

a fe days ago several babies in a Pennsylvania Hospital died due to what we believe is Bacteria introduced into the Breast Milk by Homeless Women selling their Breast Milk

The Homeless are now showing signs of diseases like Leprosy, Incurable TB, Hook and Mouth Disease, Trench Foot, and many other diseases not seen for decades

So now - as these hospitals give out certain drugs to the homeless they are now lactating and selling their Contaminated Breast Milk back to the Hospitals and this milk is contaminated with whatever the women have in their system - form Haroine and Fentanyl to Leprosy.

We are now asking the hospitals to not buy BREAST MILK from anyone who has not has a shower withing the last 6 months - how about 24 hours and stop paying them in cash but in checks.

We are also asking the hospitals to test breast milk for various disease and drugs before using it


VIDEO:  (2740) Nationwide Breast Milk Scandal - Now Killing Our Babies - YouTube


The Wall Of Truth

Dr William B. Mount
========================================

If the Hospitals learned how to use this machine we believe the Premies would do much better:

EarthPulse PEMF - USA Sales, Support and Training

Or Call Coach Jimmy K At: 503-395-4142

I believe 3 or 4 of these Tesla Coils placed throughout the Premies Section would counter the Negative Effects of all those electronics

And - If the babies live to Full Term you get paid as a Hospital to Full Term - Don't You?

So by purchasing the PEMF you , as a Hospital, may see better survival rates and actually bring in more money as a Corporation - a Double Whammy - in a good way

More profit, healthier babies - Right?
========================================

THEY ARE SOOO TINY AND SO PRECIOUS








Image result for preemie baby




Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Judgement Day Cyborgs Have Arrived

JUDGEMENT DAY CYBORGS HAVE ARRIVED

(578) Judgement Day Cyborgs Have Arrived - YouTube

==========

Brought to you by Trade Genius - a Serious trading Company For Serious Traders.

==========

The US Army has just announced it is developing a weaponized Drone - a type of Cyborg - that automatically Detects, Recognizes, Classifies, Identifies, Targets, and Fires Upon enemy Combatants using Artificial Intelligence without Human Oversight.

SELF CHARGING, CLOAKED MICROWAVE CANNON KILLING MACHINES IN HT ESKY





If they have announced it’s development that means they already have it.

This means that the First Judgment Day Weapon has arrived. You simply turn it on and watch it kill until it is out of power.

Once this technology transfer is complete these drones will use Machine-Learning Algorithms to create the Ultimate Killing Machine.

Once released in an area these weapons would continue to kill until they return for either more power or more ammunition. If installed with a “Nuke Pac” for perpetual Energy and Microwave weapons (And A Cloak Like The X-33B) the will simply fly until their circuits burn out.

The ultimate self-powered Doomsday Machine has arrived.

Pray they fail to build these machines.
==========

MYSTERY OF CANADIAN AND AMERICAN DIPLOMATS RETURN FROM CUBA WITH BRAIN DAMAGE

Over the last 3 years both American and Canadian Diplomats in Cuba have been attacked causing brain damage in both Diplomats and their families.

The attacks have occurred in the Embassies, in their homes, and while traveling in Cuba.

Two things these folks who were attacked have in common.

1st) They all have Cell Phones they keep close to them.

2nd) They all receive Excellent Health Care and their records are maintained by the Intelligence Communities - run by the Super Duper Top Secret Space Program run by Lockheed Martin out of their Bethesda Maryland Headquarters.

So here is a group of relatively healthy Canadians and Americans that can have new frequencies tested on them through their Cell Phones and then receive a complete Medical Work Ups that will determine what these Frequencies did to them.

So apparently the CIA has been using these Diplomats as “Guine Pigs” for their New Frequency Weapons now being developed.
==========

GUESS WHO THE LARGEST ARMS DEALER IN THE WORLD IS???

1 June 2012 John Shapiro - Assistant Director of the US State Department: “The purpose of the State Department is to sell weapons.”

When Donald Trump came on board as President he implemented New Rules and Regulations that these Arms dealers will begin selling American Made Weapons.

After coming on board he helped clear internal regulations that hindered US from selling weapons to Europe and Japan.

Over the last year US Weapons Sales have skyrocketed. In fact -- both Internal and External sales of US Weapons and Weapons Systems may reach into the $Trillions as local Law Makers remove YOUR rights to keep and bear arms.

Just Internal Weapons Purchases Alone are as follows:

Lockheed Martin - $30 Billion
Boeing: $15 Billion
Raytheon: 12 Billion
Atheon (Godless) : Unknown
General Dynamics: 12 Billion
Northrup Grumman: 10 Billion

This does not include Software development by Microsoft, Military Contracts By Booze Allen Hamilton which has an Open Book on Expenses, and all of the contracts set out to develop things like the Super Soldier, New Magnetic Anti-Gravity Engines, The Military attempting to open Star-Gates in Syria and Cheyenne Mountain, Operation Mockingbird… The List Goes On An On.

Adding up all these expenses - including the Underground bases - US Expenditures this year alone my top $6 Trillion Digital Dollars that is simply “Added Into” the world’s economy.

So yes - President Donald Trump has just become the largest Arms Dealer in the world.

Pray for the President’s Safety.
==========

IN OTHER NEWS:

1) Somebody just stole 640 pounds of dynamite and 400 Blasting Caps form a construction Site in Lancaster County form the Greegory General contracting Company.

Only the FBI, the employees and the BATFE knew these explosives were there.

It is unlikely any of the Employees would have stolen these Explosives because the local Police would be allo over them.

What is funny is that there was no security required to store 640 pounds d of explosives - no camera either.

So apparently either the FBI or BATF is planning for a False Flag using Dynamite Very, Very soon.
==========

2) The Syrian Police sit at the site of the recent “Chemical Weapons” attack.

A Chlorine Gas attack truns everything green.

Do you see anything green here?

Yeaaa - A Fake Attack.
==========

3) Russia is ready to leave the SWIFT Trading System all together.

Thy will be followed by a dozen other nations and the US Dollar is not allowed into the New CIPS Trading System run by the GhengisKahn Bank in Red China.
=====

4) A New Study shows that the “Snowflake Approved” hand dryers that blow air tend to blow Fecal Matter all over the Public Restrooms.
==========

FINALLY:

We just had a good friend die from a heart Attack yesterday.

Life is short and do not waste it.

Spend time with family and friends. If you are not sure they have plans - invite them over for Dinner, or take them out to lunch.

One day they are here and the next day they are gone.

We just open a Patriot Pantry Meal or a Thrive Life Meal and add hot water - add some Chicken or Corn and Garlic Bread - and you have a meal fit for a King.

Life is so short - enjoy it.

Go to William Mount Cooking for more details.
==========

AGAIN:

Please pray for President Trump’s Safety and that he begins to listen to GOD.
==========

YOU ARE THE DIFFERENCE

  ==========


WE NEED YOUR PRAYERS TO STAY ON THE AIR

==========
YOU make the difference. We can not emphasize that enough.
==========

Please pray that your families and prepare for any emergency.

==========

This is OUR country and here WE stand for FREEDOM

This is YOUR channel where about 90% of the stories come from YOU

Often times I have another story read to go - but since is YOUR channel we report on what YOU have asked for.

YOU have a voice

The News You Need

The Wall Of Truth

Dr William B. Mount



Autonomous Drones Will Soon Decide Who To Kill


Canada evacuates diplomats’ families from Cuba, citing mysterious brain injuries


Trump Becomes America's Top Arms Dealer In Quest To Boost US Weapons Sales | Zero Hedge


Booz Allen Hamilton | Consulting, Analytics, Digital Solutions, Engineering, Cyber


640 pounds of explosives stolen in Lancaster County, ATF says


Syria says chemical weapons experts may visit Douma on Wednesday | One America News Network


Russia Is Ready For Possible SWIFT Cutoff, Debt-Sale Ban | Zero Hedge


STUDY: Restroom hand dryers blow microscopic feces particles all over the place… but it’s called “green technology” – NaturalNews.com

A SNOWFLAKE APPROVED HAND DRYER:





Thursday, March 16, 2017

Obama's Elites Are Killing Us - Fight Back

THE ELITES ARE KILLING US - FIGHT BACK

We do these videos to help us fight back.

Video: Obama's Elites Are Killing Us - Fight Back - YouTube

One if by land, two if by sea, three if by both land and sea?

We will need to put out about 100 Lanterns.

They are hitting us with:

1) Con Trails
2) Vaccinations
3) Food additives

4) Toxic Waste in Fertilizers
5) Toxic Waste in the oceans - reducing the Oxygen Levels
6) Wars - Killing people world wide

7) Nuclear Energy Leaks - which are ongoing
8) Poisons in our Water
9) Poisons in our Air

10) Electronically
11)  The list goes on and on and on.

The list just goes on and on an on.
=========================

On our videos there are 4 parts….

First - we cover the politics so we can pray and stop these murdering Elites - such as the news today that North Korea is deploying their entire army to the South Korean boarder.

Second - We try and stop the Assassinations of President (Like the hit on Trump 27 March) and Nuclear War. Both of which would lead to cracking this planet apart.

Third - We do videos that allow us LITTLE PEOPLE to fight back ands live a fairly normal life. So we discuss eating products like Immusist, Citricare, Get The Tea’s Life Change Tea, etc.

Fourth - We are now absolutely upsetting the Medical Community in our Anti-aging Efforts by figuring out how to trun the hands of time backwards on your age.

Even in our William Mount Cooking vides we try and cover most of these 4 parts but focus on how to cook Storable Foods and how to incorporate products inot our cooking that reverse cancer, Autism, etc.
==========================

So hang on folks and pray that you can continue to come here and learn for YOUR own health and safety.

Got a call last night that in exactly 6 days the US Military will begin spraying 2 compounds across the world. The first will give you huge headaches and the second will give you huge amounts of Phlegm - wheezing.

So we pray they are immobilized and stock up on Liquid Advil, Magnetic Bracelets, Licorice Root, Nettles, Immusist, Citricare, Life Change Tea Products and pray even more that their plan back fires.

The spraying will begin in Maine and go world wide within 2 days. Even DC will get hit - HARD.

By the way - they were warned in DC and they did not act and do as GOD asked them to do. So what happens there - oh well….

=========================
----SAVINGS TIP OF THE DAY----

Buy storable food now while it is still reasonable priced.
The News You Need and consider building a Green House and covering your gardens to protect them from the spraying.
=========================

The News You Need

Dr William B. Mount





Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Another Banksta Bites The Dust - Go 6 Zeroes

ANOTHER BANKSTA BITES THE DUST - GO 6 ZEROES

Yet another banksta has bitten the dust - this time long term Philly Mob Boss Lewis Katz.

(((Please Pray that the Bankstas understand why they are being killed)))

The Title of the article is not meant to be funny but informative as to why these Bankstas are being killed. We stated this would begin happening 7 years ago in letters, TV and in print. Seven years to the day after we stated it the killing has begun. GOD WILL NOT BE MOCKED.

The Banksta killed this time is Long Term Philly Mob Boss Lewis Katz.

HGe was apparently in his Gulf Stream IV aircraft blew up upon take off at 9:40 PM as it was departing Hanscom about 20 miles North West of Boston.

Whether or not this was a MOB hit from President Obama, or not, remains only speculation but according to many he had the most to gain from this man's death. Lewis Katz was about to tell the world who killed president Kennedy and why.

Fortunately for us the Chief General of the Jesuits already admitted to his organizations killing of President President Kennedy, why they did it,a and who did it in his 150 page interview on the net.

But remember ---- it was All George Bush's Fault.

Obama Kills Top Philly Mob Boss Linked To JFK Assassination

Nancy Pelosi in a recent interview: It was all George Bush's Fault:

▶ Nancy Pelosi Confronted on NSA Spying - YouTube

----------
A Statement To The Russians and Chinese:

WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE HORRIFIED AT THE US CORPORATION'S USE OF WEATHER CONTROL MACHINES TO FLOOD, AND KILL, BOTH CHINESE AND RUSSIAN CITIZENS IN SOUTHERN SIBERIA. AMBASSADOR WILLIAM B. MOUNT.

Tonight we will try and post methods to stop these cloaked weather modifying machines from killing more Chinese and Russian citizens. Time, however, may post pone this disclosure.
----------
The News You Are Not Supposed To Know.

Dr William B. Mount






Monday, January 20, 2014

US State Department States: Killing Syrian Terrorists is Wrong

UNBELIEVABLE BUT TRUE

DUMB DUMB KERRY STRIKES AGAIN

 

Background Briefing on Secretary Kerry's Travel to Montreux and Davos, Switzerland


Special Briefing

Office of the Spokesperson
Senior Administration Officials
Via Teleconference
Washington, DC
January 20, 2014


SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. We’ll turn it over quickly to [Senior State Department Official Two], who will be the Senior State Department Official speaking during this call. We just wanted to preface from the top, obviously there have been a lot of developments over the past 24 hours. We will be available to answer questions as information becomes available, but we’re not going to speculate on hypotheticals on what may happen if. So we know we have limited time, you have lots of questions, and we just wanted to preface that from the beginning.
Also, as always, your lines will be open for follow-ups, but there are a number of people on the call, so if you can just try to keep it to one question so we can get around, that would be very much appreciated. So let me turn it over to [Senior State Department Official Two].
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Good morning, everybody. And I apologize I was a couple of minutes late. First off, I’d just say I’m happy to chat with you about what’s going on. I’m not in New York, I’m in Istanbul, and so I’m not the best person to ask for the moment-by-moment state of play between Ban Ki-moon and the United States that’s going on in the United States. I recommend you talk to USUN about that.
But I’m happy to talk about where we are with the Syrians, both the regime and what it’s doing, and then where the Syrian opposition is. And I’d just lead off by saying that there was a lot of effort on the part of many people in the Syrian opposition, both the political opposition and the armed opposition, to get them to where they were willing to go to Geneva. They have suspended that decision. They’re waiting to see what happens with the Iran invitation. And so we’re all sort of in Turkey right now with the state of play being, I think, more between Tehran and New York than with the Syrians here for the moment.
And so with that, I think I’ll just be happy to take the first question. And, [Senior State Department Official One], are we on background or deep background or what?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: It’s background for attribution to Senior State Department Officials. And obviously the purpose – and I should have mentioned this – is to preview the Geneva --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: The trip.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: -- conference, which we are still planning for despite the events.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Yes, okay.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: So let me turn it over to the first question.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Okay.
OPERATOR: Ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to ask a question, please press * followed by the 1. You will hear a tone indicating that you’ve been placed in queue, and you may remove yourself from queue at any time by pressing the # key. Once again, for questions, please press *1 at this time.
Our first question today comes from the line of Anne Gearan with the Washington Post. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Hi. Hi, [Senior State Department Official Two]. I just – I understand you’re not going to go into hypotheticals, but I mean, there’s just sort of a giant hanging one out here. I mean, is the United States prepared to walk away itself if the ground rules are abrogated here and Iran participates on the terms that Ban has apparently invited them to participate on?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Mm-hmm. Well, as I said, I’m not going to get into hypotheticals, so we’re not at that point yet, although it’s getting close. We’re going to have to make a decision. It’s very fluid. So we’re in touch with a lot of capitals. We’re in touch with the people in the Syrian opposition as well.
What I just would like to underline because I think this is really important: For a year, we have been meeting with the United Nations and with Russians in Geneva. I’ve been in all of those discussions, when I was with Secretary Kerry when he went to Moscow and met Lavrov last May. And we have been very explicit and clear in both behind closed doors in meetings with the United Nations and Russians, and publicly that we did not think that any country that refused to endorse the Geneva I communique, the one from June 30th, 2012 – any country that refused to endorse it and support its full implementation should not be in a Geneva peace conference.
And so we are where we are, but I just want to make clear that it’s not – this isn’t a new American stance. It has been very consistent. We have said we do not think there should be a conference at which a country – it could be Iran, could be other countries – that refuse to accept publicly the Geneva I communique’s full implementation. And in that case, we didn’t think they should be in the conference.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: And one thing to add, Anne, just given there were statements overnight: Our view remains the same as it was last night. So their statements this morning yet again fall far short of meeting the bar, as [Senior State Department Official Two] outlined, of what we have long communicated publicly and privately we expect. So we continue to believe that Iran should not attend if it has not endorsed the Geneva communique. And obviously the statements overnight did not do that.
QUESTION: Okay. So one quick follow-up. So that means a difficult conversation between you and Ban’s office, correct? Can you talk a little bit about that?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Again, I’m in Istanbul, I’m not in New York, so I don’t know how difficult the conversation is going to be. But our position is very firm and it’s not new, which is that Iran has never endorsed the Geneva I communique and has actually refused to do it. It’s been asked many times, and it’s always refused to do it. And so we just do not see how it can get an invitation.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: And we have communicated this point --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: And I know – and believe me, I mean, think of it. This context is important also. The Geneva I communique, if you look at it, talks about the parties, meaning the international parties that are signing up to it, are going to work to deescalate tensions on the ground. Iran’s actions are just the opposite. They are actually escalating problems on the ground. They have sent in their own uniformed military personnel, Iranian Revolutionary Guards forces. They have mobilized foreign militias to go fight in Syria, whether they be from Afghanistan, whether they be from Lebanon, Hezbollah, whether they be from Iraq. The Iranians have provided substantial amounts of military material and they have backed the regime economically.
They are doing nothing to deescalate tensions and sectarian tensions in particular. I mean, now they’re actually – their actions are aggravating them. And so the idea that they would come to the conference refusing to acknowledge support for the Geneva I communique, from our point of view we just do not see how it could be helpful.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Thank you. Let’s move on to the next question.
OPERATOR: Our next question comes from the line of Michael Gordon, representing The New York Times. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Yeah, thank you. Just very quickly, a question and a quick clarification. [Senior State Department Official Two], President Assad was quoted just today as telling a French news agency that the purpose of the conference should be a war against terrorism and that it was unrealistic that – to think that his government would share power with the opposition. Given these statements, do you think – and also the letter from their foreign minister that the regime is coming itself with a mandate at the conference in mind and that the conditions have been set with – for progress.
And then second, just a quick clarification. [Senior State Department Official One], Brahimi said a week ago today that all – the decision as to invite Iran was to be taken by consensus only, meaning the United States, Russia, and the UN. It would seem to me that if the U.S. is not satisfied, Iran cannot, in fact, attend. This is supposed to be a consensus decision. Has the UN violated the principle of consensus? And if you don’t agree that Iran has met the conditions, isn’t it the case that Iran simply can’t attend?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: I’m going to – just for a minute on the Assad interview, Michael, a couple of things I would say. Number one, the invitation letter itself from the secretary general is very clear about what the purpose of the conference and the subsequent Syrian-to-Syrian negotiations are about, and that is the implementation of the Geneva I communique. The Geneva I communique nowhere mentions fighting terrorism. Those words are not in the text. Look it up.
It talks instead about measures to deescalate on the ground, for example: cessation of using heavy weapons; stopping to move troops into civilian residential areas; withdrawing troops out of those areas, actually, back to bases; humanitarian access, which is a huge problem right now in Syria; release of prisoners, another huge problem in Syria right now; and the establishment by mutual consent of a transition governing body.
That’s what’s in the Geneva communique, and the invitation letter makes very clear that this conference is about the implementation of that communique and in particular, the establishment of a transition governing body. The Russians agreed to that invitation letter text as one of the two initiating states, and we did.
So the foreign minister in Syria is welcome to make any statements he wants, but the agenda of the meeting should make clear that the purpose of this – these Syrian discussions, the conference itself and then the discussions between the two Syrian delegations, should be implementation of the Geneva I communique.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: And on your other piece, Michael, I think our statement last night was pretty clear, but let me just reiterate. Iran has not publicly endorsed Geneva, not before last night and not overnight. Since they have not made a public statement – or their public statement, I should say, falls well short of what the UN says it was told, we expect the invitation will be rescinded. We, of course, saw Brahimi’s comments and we’ve been in close touch with the UN, and we’ll see what happens over the course of the day.
QUESTION: But isn’t it – [Senior State Department Official One], just to clarify, isn’t it the case that Iran can only attend on a consensus basis, and if the United States agrees that they have met the conditions to attend and that you – if you don’t accept those conditions, they cannot attend? Because that’s been the case.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Well, Michael, I think I’ve been clear what our position is. I’m not going to speculate on what’s going to happen today. Obviously, they haven’t met the conditions that the United States has set out.
QUESTION: Okay.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: We’re ready for the next question.
OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question today comes from the line of Kim Ghattas with the BBC. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Yes, hi. Good morning, [Senior State Department Official Two] and [Senior State Department Official One]. My questions were asked, but I’ll perhaps do a bit of a follow-up.
Can you tell us – and if, [Senior State Department Official Two], you can’t answer that question, perhaps, [Senior State Department Official One], you can clarify a little bit – what was the sequence of events that led to Mr. Ban Ki-moon issuing this invitation? Were you taken by surprise? Did you expect him to issue the invitation? Did you say we will object if you do? Or I mean, we’re a little bit in the dark here about what happened. And I understand that some of that is (inaudible) over at UN mission with the U.S. mission and the United – the UN itself.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Well, what I – Kim, again, I’m not in New York and I’m not in the discussions between Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and a team in New York or the Secretary. But we have always said that before Iran or any other country invited to the Geneva II conference gets an invitation, it should publicly support the full implementation of the Geneva I communique. We’ve said that for all countries – not just for Iran, but for all countries.
What’s interesting is, like, Iran is about the only country that refused to do it. So that position, as I said, goes back to January of a year ago. So that position is longstanding before Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon ever issued his invitation. Now, I think the secretary-general has had conversations with Iranian officials. We’re not privy to those. But the American position throughout has been quite, quite consistent.
QUESTION: But if – sorry, just to follow up. If Ban Ki-moon is satisfied with what he heard from Mr. Zarif, obviously he understands that those are the conditions for Iran to attend, and he issued the invitation based on his conversation with Mr. Zarif. So why are you still not satisfied, or why is he satisfied and you aren’t?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Well, first of all – first of all, because all of the other countries that are going to this conference – I want to underline this, this is a point that is frequently mischaracterized by some other countries’ foreign ministers. Iran is not being asked to do anything that other countries have not already done, including, for example, Saudi Arabia, which has repeatedly stated in public – look at the different London 11, Friends of Syria communiques dating all the way back to the first one in Istanbul in March of 2013. There is a mention of the utility of finding a political solution along the lines of the Geneva communique. The Saudis have consistently – whether it be in a London 11 communique in Istanbul or the London 11 communique in Amman or the London 11 communique in Doha, or the most recent ones in London and then in Paris – the Saudis have consistently signed up and said they support implementation of the Geneva I communique. Iran, by contrast, has never done that.
And so they are not being asked to do anything that no one else has done. To the contrary, they’re simply being asked to join an international norm. They decline so far to do so. Their latest statements do not do so. If you look at them very carefully, there is no mention anywhere of full implementation of Geneva I communique, and especially the most sensitive part, which is the establishment of a transition government with full executive authorities established by mutual consent.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Just to add one thing --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Frankly, the Iranian policy is pretty clear, actually, when you look at it on the ground.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Just to add one thing, Kim. So we did know and we had been in touch with the UN, as would be (inaudible), over the last 24 hours or so. We expressed the same concerns privately that we made publicly. Since the public statement that was made overnight by the Iranians falls far short of what the UN said it was told privately, we expect the UN will review the invitation that was issued. Our statement last night made very clear and expressed clearly what our concerns are. So I don’t think there should be mystery. That’s a summary of where we stand at this point.
QUESTION: Okay. Thanks.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: We should move on to the next question.
OPERATOR: All right. Our next question comes from the line of Elise Labott with CNN. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Thank you. Thanks for doing this, [Senior State Department Official Two] and [Senior State Department Official One]. Just a quick question and then I’ll add a kind of larger question. Did – when you said, [Senior State Department Official One], that they – we expressed this privately, could you say who expressed that? Did Secretary Kerry call Ban Ki-moon, or how was that communicated?
And then just in general, I mean, I understand that the opposition voted to go, but only about two-thirds of their members even went to this meeting, a big – I think a little bit more than a third decided not to attend the meeting because they don’t support Geneva. And then out of that, you had your consensus. So we’re talking only about a half of the opposition that supports this conference.
And I’m – just given the fact of what Michael’s question was about the regime not really coming prepared to discuss a transitional government, given the fact that the opposition is – remains still very divided and there is a lot of concern that this conference could actually cause them to collapse, I’m just wondering how realistic you are about any type of progress at this conference towards the goals.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Okay. [Senior State Department Official One], do you want to go first, or shall I?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Oh, go ahead, [Senior State Department Official Two]. I’ll follow you.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Okay, a couple of things. First – and I should have mentioned this when Michael asked his question – I don’t think anyone who’s dealt with Syrian officials has any false expectations of rapid progress. I’m old enough to remember Bashar al-Assad’s father, Hafez al-Assad, and when he was negotiating with Philip Habib and the Israelis in the Bekaa Valley in the Lebanon war in – well, that was 1984 – 1983 and ’84.
So I mean, the Syrians – officials, that regime is very tough. They’re very provocative at the negotiating table. They say outrageous things. They’re a known quantity. And everybody has to understand that this is the beginning of a process. It’s not going to be fast. It’s very bitter fighting on the ground. And so there’s going to be an absolute requirement for patience and for persistence.
But the opening of a process, we think, is important. I think it is also important to note that there are elements inside the regime itself and among its supporters that are anxious to find a peaceful solution. And we have gotten plenty of messages from people inside. They want a way out. And so if this conference provides an impetus to finding a way forward whereby Syrians understand that the issue is not the entire state of Syria, the issue is a ruling family – rapacious, incredibly brutal – and the change of some officials, but the safeguarding of the remaining institutions of the state so that we don’t have a repeat of the Iraq scenario. I think it is possible with persistence to drive that point home and isolate a brutal ruling family.
Oh, you asked about the opposition and whether or not they’re united and the number of voters. There were two issues that were dividing the coalition. One was Geneva. The second was Sheikh Ahmad Jarba himself. A lot of people don’t like his leadership style. There are complaints about him; that is not secret. We actually received an official letter, Secretary Kerry did, from the faction whose third didn’t go to the vote – the one that you were talking about, Elise. So in fact, that faction has communicated to Kerry that they support a political process, they support the Geneva process, but they didn’t vote because they’re unhappy about Ahmad Jarba himself.
I think more important, frankly, than the different factions of the Istanbul-based opposition are the reactions of armed groups on the ground. And I think this is vital and probably hasn’t been reported on enough. There were meetings here in Turkey between four major factions. Those factions are the Islamic Front, the Syrian Revolutionaries Front, the Jaish al-Mujaheddin, and the Ajnad al-Sham. Those meetings were over the weekend. And at the end, they issued a statement saying that they did not object to – or first of all, that they supported a political solution if it would save lives and help bring about a transition government faster than sole reliance on military means; they supported a political process.
And second, they did not object to the coalition sending a delegation to Geneva to discuss that, as long as it was understood that the purpose of the talks in Geneva was to discuss full implementation of the Geneva accord and establish a transition governing body. They had themselves the text of the UN invite, so they clearly looked at it and copied it into the statement that was issued on – got to get my days right – Friday.
So I think that statement by those armed groups was probably the single-most important thing that then gave confidence to the political opposition people here in Istanbul to go forward. The next day, they voted to go forward and send a team to Geneva.
Can I just add one more thing and then I’ll shut up?
QUESTION: Yes.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: In addition, among those armed groups that were meeting here in Turkey last Friday and Saturday, some of them have come forward and said they would like to put representatives of their fighting battalion in the delegation going to Geneva. And I believe that is being – it’s actually been worked. They may still be doing it. I know they’re discussing which people they’re going to take. There will be representatives from the armed opposition in the Geneva Syrian-to-Syrian talks if we get over the current hurdle and get to the conference and the Syrian talk.
QUESTION: Just a quick follow, [Senior State Department Official Two]. You mentioned you’re getting messages from elements of the regime anxious to find a political solution.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Mm-hmm.
QUESTION: Are you saying that you’re getting private communications from members of the regime that are – that you think that you might be able to peel away? I mean, could you just flesh that out just a bit?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Yes, that is exactly what I’m saying. I’m not going to say much more than that, but we regularly get messages. Can I just give you some examples of what I’m talking about? I’m not going to name any names, obviously. I don’t want to get anybody killed, and they would be killed. It’s a very brutal regime. But here are just a couple of public things.
Frequently at funerals for Alawi soldiers that are killed – and the regime is heavily relying now on Alawi militias as well as foreign Shia militias from Lebanon and Iraq, and now more and more even from Afghanistan of all places. But for the Syrian Alawi soldiers that are killed, there are not infrequent demonstrations against the regime, so that in some cases the regime has actually delayed transferring bodies home, because they don’t want to trigger political unrest in the regime’s own heartland around Qardaha and Latakia, that area there. And a prominent member of one of the regime’s families – there are three main families in the regime – this one from the Shalish family was murdered by Alawis in Bashar al-Assad’s hometown of Qardaha a couple of weeks ago.
So my point is that the Alawi community has borne the brunt of the fighting. If they see that there is a way out – which this is the political opposition’s time to present that way out; that’s the whole point of their going to Geneva, to promote the alternative, the alternative vision and the alternative possibility – I think they will get a lot of resonance inside Damascus and inside the rest of the country.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: One piece, Elise, just to add before we move on. The Secretary has been in touch with Ban Ki-moon over the course of the weekend, as have other officials.
Let’s move on to the next question.
OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Cami McCormick with CBS. Please go ahead.
Ms. McCormick, is your line muted?
QUESTION: Are you there? Can you hear me now?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: We’re here. Go ahead, Cami.
QUESTION: Can you hear me?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Yep.
QUESTION: Okay. Thank you for doing this. I have two questions. One, is Secretary Kerry making any phone calls today, [Senior State Department Official One]?
And also, sort of to follow up on Anne’s question, how surmountable is this – insurmountable? Is this a deal-breaker? If Iran doesn’t change its stance and the invitation isn’t withdrawn, is this a deal-breaker for the U.S.?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: [Senior State Department Official Two], do you want me to start, or do you want to start?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Yeah, no, you go ahead. I think you’re closer to the Secretary, so you’ll know more about his schedule than I will.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Well, Cami, the Secretary was on the phone this weekend. I mentioned that he spoke with Ban Ki-moon, and certainly he is open to making calls today. We’ll see if there’s an update to get around to all of you. I expect he will be, I guess is the short answer.
I think we’ve addressed the other question, and we don’t want to get ahead of where we are at this point. Obviously, those statements that they made don’t meet the bar we feel that they needed to meet. We expect the UN will take a – will reevaluate the invitation. Beyond that, I don’t think we want to speculate on where things will land.
[Senior State Department Official Two], anything else you’d like to add to that?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: No. I think we’re all waiting to see if Iran does anything.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Okay. Let’s move on to the next question.
OPERATOR: Our next question comes from the line of Jo Biddle with the AFP. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Hi, guys. Can you hear me?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Yep, we can.
QUESTION: Okay, great. Just a couple of questions, quick ones. First off, do you know yet who is going to be leading the Syrian delegation, the regime delegation, to the Geneva talks?
And secondly, on the interview that AFP did with Assad on Sunday, he is saying that he anticipates that he may well run again. And I just wondered what your reaction was to that. He said there’s a significant chance he’ll seek a new term, and he’s ruling out this sharing power – any sharing of power with the opposition, saying it would be a joke to put them into any kind of government. Could you just react to that? Thanks.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Yeah, sure. With respect to who’s going to lead the Syrian delegations, I think they need to announce that. I don't want – it shouldn’t be the Americans that announce that.
What I can say is that the delegation is very likely to have both members of the political opposition inside Syria as well as members of the political opposition outside Syria, members of the armed opposition from inside Syria. I expect it’s going to have at least one, possibly two Kurdish politicians. It will have a couple of women. Beyond that, I don't know too much yet. They made the decisions on the delegation composition, I understand, only early this morning. So – and they have to communicate that now to the United Nations, and I’m not sure they have or not.
QUESTION: Sorry. I was asking --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: And then they announced they were suspending their participation. I’m not sure they went ahead and informed the United Nations of who their delegation would be. They may have put that on hold.
Oh, you had a question then about Bashar al-Assad’s statement.
QUESTION: Yes, that’s right. Actually --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: And I do have --
QUESTION: -- thank you for that.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: I do have a comment on that. First, this is a guy who has used Scud rockets. This is a guy who’s used chemical weapons on several occasions, killing literally thousands of people. This is a guy who has surrounded cities and starved them. If you look at the Homs opposition revolution Facebook page yesterday, you will see pictures of bodies of people who have allegedly starved. It looks like people who have come out of concentration camps in World War II, these emaciated bodies. This is a man who is using this kind of force to stay in power.
And we have long ago thought he lacks legitimacy and would not win in a free and fair election. His family controls the intelligence apparatus, which is an incredibly brutal apparatus. They have never had a free and fair election in the country. The idea that international observers could go into Syria in the middle of a war and manage an election process which the family controls the election machinery for is ludicrous. And I really mean that – ludicrous.
In addition, the population is approximately one-third either refugees or internally displaced. And how you would arrange for voter registration, how you would arrange for candidate registration is entirely unclear during a war.
So you have a variety of both technical issues and then just – how do I put it? – credibility issues. And so I don’t think – he may present himself as a candidate, but I cannot imagine that it would be in a free and fair election, and it certainly would not stop the fighting. So to us, his joining an election process, again, in the summer, is simply not a way to end the fighting in Syria.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Let’s move on to the next question.
OPERATOR: Our next question today comes from the line of Margaret Brennan representing CBS News. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Thank you. A question for Administration Official Number One here. Just to clarify, when you’re talking about some of the signs that you’ve seen from within the regime, has any of that led you to believe that when the regime actually shows up in Switzerland that they would be in a position to negotiate in good faith?
And secondly, on the opposition which you’ve been working with very closely, did you have assurances that they are now in a place where they could show up in Switzerland with a list of folks who could participate in any potential transitional government, any way to talk about anything beyond humanitarian support at this point?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: I think we view the opening of Syrian-to-Syrian discussions about the full implementation of the Geneva I communique, both the different elements to deescalate on the ground and improve the immediate living conditions for Syrians, whether it be humanitarian aid or the release of prisoners or allowing journalists and others to move around freely or establishing the transition government, we think that it will give heart to those inside Syria who want to find a way out of this.
I don’t think anybody, whether in the political opposition or the armed opposition, or frankly within large segments of the regime, (a), are happy with the situation – I think even people in the regime acknowledge that it’s tragic; maybe not Bashar in his interview that was very hardline, but we’ve gotten plenty of messages from other people who say that this is sad and tragic.
But more importantly, it is an occasion for the opposition to present a vision and to present a plan for how to get out of it. And I think there will be a huge amount of media attention given to them and just by necessity because there are going to be so many media there. And it will be an unprecedented opportunity for them to actually show Syrians inside Syria and even inside the regime that the problem is not the state, the problem is not Syrians who have been backing Assad; the problem is the family and the immediate circle around Assad, and that they – there is a way to isolate those people and move forward as a country.
So – but I don’t want to pretend that that’s easy, and I don’t want to pretend that it’s simple; it’s not. It’s going to be a long, hard process – a grinding process, I would say. And we have warned the opposition people going into Geneva in this delegation if they go – which is a big if – if they go that this is not going to be done quickly. It’s going to be a long process.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Let’s --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Did you have a question about the armed groups?
QUESTION: Well, I asked if they – if the opposition actually had a list of candidates for a transitional government. But I also asked --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: I would prefer – I would – let me answer it this way, but I think you ought to ask them. If you go to Geneva, ask them yourself. It shouldn’t be me talking about what their plan is.
But what I can tell you is this: They have had a team working on different proposals. They have had a series of international legal firms working with them, for example, that they’ve hired. And they have developed some fairly detailed proposals. And so they will be ready, I think, if they go to Geneva, to put those on the table. And I know that Walid Muallim says they’re not going to discuss – the Syrian regime’s delegation to – they’re not going to discuss transition government arrangements. But the letter, the invite from the secretary general of the United Nations is very clear. So – but Brahimi, who will be the mediator in those Syrian-to-Syrian talks, to find a way a way to manage that agenda issue.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: We have time for just two quick more questions. I know --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Yeah. I was going to say my team is forming up here, [Senior State Department Official One], so I’ve got to cut out.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: I’m sure they’re staring you down. So let’s do two more questions, and then we’ll conclude the call.
Operator?
OPERATOR: All right. Our next --
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: (Inaudible.)
OPERATOR: Our next question will come from the line of Lesley Wroughton with Reuters. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: Yes, hi. Thank you for this. [Senior State Department Official Two] and [Senior State Department Official One], I just want to be clear: Are you expecting the UN to withdraw that invitation, or is that unclear now? That’s my first question.
The second one is: Given what’s happening now, I mean, can you still expect that conference to go ahead?
And then number three, have you made any advances on a humanitarian corridor? Do you think that the confidence-building steps that the Secretary was asking for from the government and opposition for the conference have been implemented? Have there been any signs of those confidence-building measures?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Can I – I want to start on the humanitarian confidence-building measures, and then we can talk about the other stuff. I don’t – so on that, last Monday, Secretary Kerry had a press conference with Foreign Minister Lavrov and the UN Special Joint Representative Lakhdar Brahimi. At that press conference, Foreign Minister Lavrov announced the Syrian regime was going to make some gestures, and he mentioned allowing food shipments into two places, al-Ghezlaniya and Jdaidet al-Shibani. Those, according to the Russians, were in this area that was blocked called the Eastern Ghouta.
To be honest, we had not heard of them, and so we checked on them. It turns out that they were – neither one of them was blockaded. Neither one of them was besieged. The government controlled both, and they were simply poor areas with legitimately needy people, but that in no way were they blocked prior to this from getting food aid. The government simply wanted the UN to send them some. But they were not in any way blockaded. People in those towns, unlike other places that are under blockage, people in those locations were able to come out and get food if they had the money or the resources to do it.
The only significant gesture that the regime has made in weeks is allowing one convoy to go into the Yarmouk camp three days ago. That is the only significant gesture they have made.
With respect to ceasefires, the government has actually escalated its bombing. They bombed residential areas in Aleppo again yesterday and killed several dozen people. It’s all over the Arabic news feeds – again, the same kind of incredibly grim film footage that we’ve seen so often. So no progress on that. The regime has said that it is prepared to do prisoner exchanges. The opposition has said it is prepared to do prisoner exchanges. And it is something we’re looking at to see if that can be arranged. But so far we do not have any progress to report.
QUESTION: And then on the other one, please?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: I don’t – as I recall you were just saying, do we know if the conference is going to be held. And I would say the situation is fluid and we’re waiting to see. I don’t – I mean, I’m just – I don't know where it’s going to go.
QUESTION: And have you received any indication that Ban Ki-moon is going to withdraw that invitation?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: I’m in Istanbul so I’m not the right – I’m not up to date on what Ban Ki-moon is doing. So I don’t know, [Senior State Department Official One], if you want to –
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: No, I don’t have any updates or predictions for you. Obviously, I would point you to the UN for that. But just to reiterate, we’ve made the same points privately that we’ve made publicly, which is that since the – Iran has not publicly and fully endorsed the Geneva communique, that we expect the invitation will be rescinded. But I would point you to the UN otherwise.
Let’s go to the last question here so [Senior State Department Official Two] can get going on the ground.
OPERATOR: Our final question today will come from the line of Margaret Warner, representing – or please excuse me, Terry Atlas with Bloomberg News. Please go ahead.
QUESTION: All right. Thanks. This will be a quick question. Just can you run through just operationally what will happen if the conference goes ahead? What will the Secretary be doing aside from speaking at the conference?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: [Senior State Department Official One], I’m going to leave that with you, because again, I think you’re closer to the Secretary’s schedule than I am.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Sure. So, Terry, the Secretary will be there on Wednesday. As you know, after Wednesday – Wednesday is the day the foreign ministers will be there, so he will be, of course, representing the United States there. The UN has put out kind of a tick-through of what the day will entail, so I would point you to them on that. But he will be there all day Wednesday, and then he plans to move to Davos on Thursday morning.
QUESTION: What – does he have any bilaterals? Will he have side meetings with the opposition or with other – the Saudis or with others?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: We are still – that’s a great question. We are still working through that, so we will venture to get you guys an update on bilateral meetings by the end of the today, if not by the time we get on the plane very early tomorrow morning. We’re still working through the schedule.
QUESTION: [Senior State Department Official One], can I ask you one other question?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Sure.
QUESTION: Some of the Israeli press are reporting that Livni is going to meet with him here in D.C. tomorrow[1]. That’s not on his public schedule. Is that happening?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: That’s correct. We’re putting out an updated public schedule shortly.
QUESTION: Will there be any kind of opening – any comments or more on that?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: No, it’s a closed press meeting.
QUESTION: Okay. Thank you.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: Thank you, everybody, for joining. We’ll be here, of course, as events unfold today. Thank you, [Senior State Department Official Two], very much for taking the time, and of course, we’ll otherwise see you all tomorrow morning bright and early on the plane.
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL TWO: Okay. Thanks, [Senior State Department Official One], thanks, everybody. Bye.